辩论：同性恋该不该合法化 正方怎么辩？（原因，影响）
是一种感情，感情本身是没错的，现在的男女比例不是一对一的，不是一个男的就刚好有个女的来配对的，感情是双方的事，如人饮水冷暖自知，我们都应该尊重。现在同性恋是否合法主要是以下问题：无子女（异性也有不少丁克一族，就是不要后代的，要子女可以收养，减轻社会负担，而且是不需要监督就自觉计划生育，非常响应政策）；（举阿拉伯的一夫多妻，异性也有不少这样，不能以此为理由反对同性的）；
举正面例子：在现在我国同性恋还不合法的时候，同性恋其实是从古至今客观存在的。断袖、龙阳的记载，早到某年（自己查）就有，记得我国还有男皇后（自己查），说明同性恋在我国古代是合法的，不合法怎么做男皇后。而且在现代，不少国家也证明了同性恋不是病，并合法化，事实证明也没有引起什么政治问题和动乱。而且对现在来说，承认自己是同性恋非常需要勇气。而且异性婚姻离婚率过大，被异性伤害对异性的不信任也间接造成同性恋的产生。呼吁其合法化也是为了保障双方的财产利益等有法律保障，和保障异性婚姻并没什么不同。
至于是爱滋的传染源，一，异性的性服务行业和吸毒才是重要的传染源，难道也要发对异性恋吗？二，这说明我国的医疗水平还不高，不能因为你水平低治不了，就不让人生病，你水平高了，治好了，不就可以啦，三，同性的419增多，其中最重要的原因就是没有合法化，他们不能正当找伴侣，异性能合法找伴侣，高调相亲，上电视找婚介，还不一定找得到，人家偷偷找，更难找了，找到不合适的分开很正常，这就造成同性的错觉。如果同性合法了，他们也可以光明正大出来找对象了，这种形象就会相应减少了。
英语辩论赛关于同性不能结婚的英语辩词
With the recent news that two same-sex marriage cases made it to the Supreme Court, people have been angrily voicing their opinions on both sides of the debate.
As a Bible-believing Christian, I feel much pressure from my conservative friends to begin protesting against the “atrocity” of homosexual marriage.
Cassidy
However, as an independent thinker, my mind leads me elsewhere.
I support same-sex marriage. While this notion might get me shunned in certain circles that would otherwise welcome me with open arms, I stand firm in my opinion.
Before you gather your pitchforks and quote the Bible, let me explain.
Believing that homosexuality is correct and allowing two people to sign a contract claiming that they will not separate are two different matters.
The first deals not only with biblical faith and conviction, but also common sense.
Obviously, humans were not physically created to be homosexual. The secular individuals who claim that they were are refuted by their very own evolutionary belief system. We have all had the birds and the bees talk, and we all know that two members of the same sex cannot procreate to complete the species-sustaining life that evolutionists claim is the only purpose of existence.
For Christians, understanding that homosexuality is unnatural is much easier to accept than not, but that viewpoint also comes with bigotry and a misunderstanding of the biblical truth that we so often quote.
Same-gender coitus is a sin, yes. But just as Jesus showed us with a bit of writing in the sand and the pardoning of an adulterous woman in John 8, only he has the authority to judge.
Everyone has sinned, and all sins are equal in the Lord’s eyes, because they are all perversions of original perfection. Consider yourself ― you liars, cheaters, those with impure thoughts ― on an equal playing field with homosexuality.
Now that the notion of homosexuality being unnatural is addressed, allow me to describe the differences between this egotistical belief that humans have the authority to deny anyone anything based on faith, and why Christians do indeed have the right to protest against same-sex marriage.
The connotations that come with the term “marriage” have interesting implications.
While I have neither the knowledge nor the space to address the complete history of marriage, I can say this: marriage, as it has been practiced in the industrial, Western world, originated as a religious affair.
It is true that other cultures outside of Christianity and Judaism have had semblances of marriage. However, at its founding, the United States primarily discussed marriage as the joining of two people ― one man and one woman ― under God.
It is here that those spewing hate toward Christians get lost.
Under God, a man and another man joining together as one is an “abomination.” Christians try to stay as true to the Bible as we possibly can, and as clear as the writing on the wall was, the forbidding of homosexual relationships shines through much of the Old Testament.
However, Christians do not understand that many of these same-sex marriage proposals are purely for equal treatment in society and are not meant to be religious affairs.
Protests against same-sex marriage on the basis of marriage being a biblical tradition might have held some ground in this debate had Christians kept true to the notion that marriage is the union of one man and one woman under God.
Once we allowed marriage to become a secular tradition open to atheists and agnostics alike, we made it available to all people. It became an equal-rights debate determined by the government, and not the joining of two lives in the name of God.
Should same-sex marriage be made a legality, it should not be performed in the church, under God, as God would not approve of such a union.
However, legally being married should be of no concern to anyone other than the two parties at hand.
As Christians, we need to practice what Jesus showed us better than anyone else ― love.
Not all Christians are bigots who only wish to seek retribution for something they know little about. Likewise, not all non-believers are Christian-hating atheists who wish only to crucify us.
这是我之前的project的的部分论词，根据自身水平和实际情况修改内容，希望能够帮到你！【ABC.Snap
】